Chickens Free Range free essay sample

Smith aspires to promote a sense of guilt to her audience. By the use of the inclusive language ‘we’, Smith implies that ‘someone’ of the opening paragraph, must have been ‘you’, the reader. This encourages the reader to feel guilty for the chickens. Similarly, Smith aims to guilt further by suggesting that if the reader was not so ‘self-serving’ and ‘human-centred’, then ‘we could afford to pay more’ to keep our, ‘furred and feathered friends’ from further pain. Smith even goes as far as attempting to incite fear in order to serve her cause. With references to an ‘over populated †¦ planet’, ‘drastically decreased †¦ numbers of animal species’, and ‘widespread human rights abuses’, Smith does this to promote remorse and guilt for the chickens. Critics of the activist’s actions are portrayed as hysterical and â€Å"idiotic†. With some quotations from a talkback radio show intended to make their views appear shallow and coarse, it is implied that, in comparison, Smith’s own position is calm and even respectful of both sides of the debate. We will write a custom essay sample on Chickens Free Range or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This is intended to influence the reader to side with the more civilized position. Smith further expanded by later quoting a rhetorical question made by a famous philosopher, Jeremy Bentham. â€Å"The question is not, can they reason?.. But can they suffer? † By using this quote, it promotes the reader to rethink what their opinions are and henceforth convinces the reader to side with Smith. In order to guarantee the reader to accept such attitudes; Smith introduces pity for the chickens to her readers. With words and phrases such as ‘dire plight’, ‘mistreat’, ‘abominably cruel’, ‘most abused’, ‘treated so badly’, and ‘trapped’, Smith encourages the reader to feel sympathy for the article’s image of three caged chickens. To bring this image into reality, Smith says the chickens are ‘without proper ventilation’. The reader is then to provide empathy for the chickens, where the chickens are ‘unable to move’, and/or to ‘breathe fresh, clean air’. In conclusion, Smith’s article, ‘Chickens Run Free’ works to persuade readers that recent activism was necessary and justified. She argues with an authoritative presentation and informed argument that aims to makes the reader want to feel guiltless, fearless, unselfish, righteous and compassionate.